Compare Chevrolet Captiva vs Cadillac XT4 vs Chevrolet Equinox 3
Variants
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
AWD
FWD
1.5
1.5 AWD
1.5
1.6d
1.6d AWD
2.0
2.0 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
637 L / 22.5 cu-ft ~ 1385 L / 48.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.4 L / 9.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Passengers
5 / 7
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
235/60 R18
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
172 mm / 6.8 in
Size | Height
1627 mm / 64.1 in
Size | Length
4599 mm / 181.1 in
Size | Width
1947 mm / 76.7 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1603.0 mm / 63.1 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2779 mm / 109.4 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Towing Capacity
1587 kg
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
LSY
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
241.0 hp / 179.7 kW @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
120.6 hp/L / 2.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 1500-4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Final Drive
3.47
Transmission | Gears
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Production
Availability
2019
Debut
2018 New York Auto Show
Made In
US: Kansas; China: Shanghai
Reviews
Neofiliac score
45%
37%
19%
Pros
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
- Good styling
- Comfortable interior
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Poser crossover
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.