Compare BMW X6 M E71 vs BMW X5 E53 LCI vs BMW X5 E53

Variants
6AT
8AT
3.0d
3.0d AT
3.0i
3.0i AT
4.4i AT
4.8is AT
3.0d
3.0d AT
3.0i
3.0i AT
4.4i AT
4.6is AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
570 L / 20.1 cu-ft ~ 1450 L / 51.2 cu-ft
465 L / 16.4 cu-ft ~ 1550 L / 54.7 cu-ft
465 L / 16.4 cu-ft ~ 1550 L / 54.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
17.0 L / 18.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
93.0 L / 24.6 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 332 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc, 324 mm
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.8 m / 42.0 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1717 mm / 67.6 in
Size | Length
4667 mm / 183.7 in
4666 mm / 183.7 in
Size | Width
1983 mm / 78.1 in
1872 mm / 73.7 in | 2180 mm / 85.8 in (mirror unfolded)
1872 mm / 73.7 in
Track Width | Front
1660.0 mm / 65.4 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1672.0 mm / 65.8 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Weight
2380.0 kg / 5247.0 lbs
Wheelbase
2933 mm / 115.5 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.7 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.5 sec
Fuel Economy
13.9 L/100km / 16.9 MPG (combined) | 19.3 L/100km / 12.2 MPG (urban) | 10.8 L/100km / 21.8 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2700 kg / 5952 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 2300 kg / 5071 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 4
Engine
S63B44
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.3:1
Engine | Displacement
4.4 L / 268.2 cu-in / 4395.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Production

Availability
2000 ~ 2003

Reviews

Neofiliac score
57%
46%
40%
Pros
  • Lots of power and torque
  • Prestige of BMW M
  • Improved automatic transmission
  • Up-rated engines
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Some utility offered
Cons
  • Ugly
  • Compromised form for compromised function
  • Exceptionally unreliable
  • Very high fuel consumption
  • Unreliable N62 V8 engine
  • Still ugly
  • Quite ugly on the outside
  • Unreliable transmission

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.