Compare Hyundai Tucson 3 vs Mercedes GLC-Class X253 vs Mercedes GLK-Class X204
Variants
0.95 kWh Fuel Cell
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDI 132 Euro6d
1.6 GDI 132
1.6 GDI 132 AT
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d
1.6 T-GDI 177
1.6 T-GDI 177 AWD
1.6 T-GDI 177 AWD AT
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d AWD
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d AWD DCT
1.6 T-GDI 177 Euro6d DCT
1.7 CRDI 116
1.7 CRDI 141 DCT
2.0 CRDI 136
2.0 CRDI 136 AWD
2.0 CRDI 136 AWD AT
2.0 CRDi 185 AWD
2.0 CRDi 185 AWD AT
2.0 CRDi 185 AWD
2.0 CRDi 185 Euro6d AWD AT
2.0 GDI 164 AT
2.0 GDI 164 AWD AT
2.4 GDI 181 AT
2.4 GDI 181 AWD AT
GLC 43 AMG 4MATIC AT
GLC 63 AMG 4MATIC+ MCT
GLC 63 AMG S 4MATIC+ MCT
F-CELL 4MATIC
GLC 220d 4MATIC AT
GLC 250 4MATIC AT
GLC 250d 4MATIC AT
GLC 300 4MATIC AT
GLC 350d 4MATIC AT
GLC 350e 4MATIC AT
GLK 200
GLK 200 CDI
GLK 200 CDI AT
GLK 220 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 220 CDI
GLK 220 CDI AT
GLK 250 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 250 4MATIC AT
GLK 280 4MATIC AT
GLK 320 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 CDI 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 CDI Euro5 4MATIC AT
GLK 350 4MATIC AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.9 deg
23.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.1 deg
19.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
35.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
16.5 deg
25.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Water Fording
300 mm / 11.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
0.9 kWh (gross)
13.5 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
123 mm / 4.8 in
Wheelbase
2873 mm / 113.1 in
2755 mm / 108.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.35
0.33
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
43%
60%
45%
Pros
- Improved exterior styling
- Good towing capacity
- Great V8 in the 63AMG models
- Cleaner exterior styling
- Low official fuel consumption
- Decent exterior styling
- Some offroad capabilities
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Boring exterior design
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Most engines are lethargic
- Fuel-cell not widely available
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Lethargic drivetrain
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.