Compare Hyundai Kona vs Peugeot 2008 II vs Peugeot 4007
Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
2.2D
2.2D AT
2.4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
510 L / 18.0 cu-ft ~ 1686 L / 59.5 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
620 kg / 1367 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1715 mm / 67.5 in
Size | Length
4300 mm / 169.3 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
1805 mm / 71.1 in
Track Width | Front
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Weight
1790.0 kg / 3946.3 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Euro 4
Engine
Kappa
2.4 l 16V 125 kW
Engine | Bore
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2007 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
21%
34%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Decent styling
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Fully independent suspension setup
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
- Poor performance
- Low build quality
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny engines
- Poor suspension setup
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.