Compare Hyundai Kona (OS) vs Hyundai Kona (OS) facelift vs Mini Paceman (R61)

Hyundai Kona (OS)

Hyundai Kona (OS) facelift

Mini Paceman (R61)

Hyundai Kona (OS)Hyundai Kona (OS) faceliftMini Paceman (R61)
Variants
1.0 T-GDi
1.6 CRDi 116
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 GDi 141 Hybrid DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 DCT
1.6 T-GDi 177 AWD DCT
2.0 150 AT
2.0 150 AWD AT
39 kWh Electric
39.2 kWh Electric
64 kWh (204 Hp) Electric
1.0 T-GDi 120
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 AWD DCT
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 AWD DCT
1.6 Turbo-GDI 195 DCT
2.0 MPI 147 AWD CVT
2.0 MPI 147 CVT
Electric
Electric Lite
Kona N
Cooper
Cooper ALL4
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper AT
Cooper D 1.6
Cooper D 1.6 ALL4
Cooper D 2.0 ALL4 AT
Cooper D 2.0 AT
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper SD
Cooper SD ALL4
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD AT
JCW
JCW AT
JCW Euro6 AT

Reviews

Neofiliac score21%29%25%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Up to 484km electric range
  • Interesting Kona N
  • Cute and iconic design
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Independent rear suspensions only for AWD model
  • Ugly
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • No powerful engine options
  • Disastrous engine unreliability
  • Ugly black plastic everywhere
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.