Compare Honda Pilot vs Honda HR-V 2 vs Chevrolet Captiva

Chevrolet Captiva / Holden Captiva Crossover (2006-2018)

Honda | Cars

Chevrolet | Cars

Variants

3.5 243 AWD

3.5 248

3.5 248 AWD

3.5 258 AWD

1.5 i-VTEC 130hp

1.5 i-VTEC 130hp AT

1.5 i-VTEC 130hp Euro6d

1.5 i-VTEC 130hp Euro6d CVT

1.5 i-VTEC Hybrid

1.5 VTEC Turbo

1.5 VTEC Turbo CVT

1.6 i-DTEC

1.6 i-DTEC Euro6d

1.8 i-VTEC

1.8 i-VTEC AWD CVT

1.8 i-VTEC CVT

2.0 VCDi 127

2.0 VCDi 127 AWD

2.0 VCDi 150

2.0 VCDi 150 AWD

2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT

2.2 VCDi 163

2.2 VCDi 163 AT

2.2 VCDi 163 AWD

2.2 VCDi 184 AT

2.2 VCDi 184 AWD

2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT

2.4

2.4 AWD

2.4 AWD AT

2.4 Ecotec 167

2.4 Ecotec 167 AT

2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD

2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT

3.0 AWD AT

3.2 AWD AT

Sport 2.4 AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

9.1 L / 9.6 qt

Fuel Capacity

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

Passengers

5 / 7

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs, 300 mm

Brakes | Rear

Disc, 312 mm

Offroad | Approach Angle

18.2 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

22.7 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Multi-link

Tire Size

235/70 R16

Turning Circle

11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height

1605 mm / 63.2 in

Size | Length

4775 mm / 188.0 in

Wheelbase

2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h

8.2 sec

Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph

7.8 sec

Coefficient Of Drag

0.38

Powertrain

Emission Standard

ULEV-2

Engine

J35A6

Engine | Bore

89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.0:1

Engine | Displacement

3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc

Engine | Redline

6700 rpm

Engine | Stroke

93.0 mm / 3.7 in

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Gears

5-speed

Transmission | Type

Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score

32%

18%

45%

Pros

Reliable engine
Some offroad capabilities
High cargo capacity

Low official fuel consumption

Reasonable drivetrain reliability
Good towing capacity

Cons

Bad 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Boring design

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Very ugly
Bad 0-100kph time
High 0.38 drag coefficient
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.