Compare Honda Pilot 2 vs Honda CR-V 5 vs Toyota Yaris Cross

Variants
AWD
FWD
1.5 173
1.5 173 AWD
1.5 190 AWD CVT
1.5 190 CVT
1.5 193 AWD CVT
1.6d 120 AT
1.6d 120 AWD AT
1.6d 160 AWD
1.6d 160 AWD AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 Hybrid AWD
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD
2.4 AWD CVT
2.4 CVT
1.5
1.5 4WD
1.5 Hybrid
1.5 Hybrid E-Four

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
79.0 L / 20.9 gal
Passengers
8
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 330 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 333 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
215/50 R18
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
Platform
TNGA: GA-B

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
203 mm / 8.0 in
170 mm / 6.7 in
Size | Height
1590 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4180 mm / 164.6 in
Size | Width
1994 mm / 78.5 in
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
2774 mm / 109.2 in
2560 mm / 100.8 in

Powertrain

Emission Standard
ULEV-2
Engine
J35Z4
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc
Engine | Power
253.0 hp / 188.7 kW @ 5700 rpm
Engine | Redline
6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
72.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
97.6 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
343 Nm / 253.0 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2015
2020
Debut
2020-04-23
Made In
Japan, France

Reviews

Neofiliac score
34%
41%
9%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • High cargo capacity
  • High engine reliability
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good engine reliability
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good reliability
Cons
  • Quite ugly
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible CVT
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Basic equipment
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor handling
  • Bland

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.