Compare Honda Pilot 2 vs Chevrolet Equinox 2 vs Chevrolet Captiva
Variants
AWD
FWD
2.4 Euro6
2.4 Euro6 AWD
2.4
2.4 AWD
3.0
3.0 AWD
3.6
3.6 AWD
3.6 Euro6
3.6 Euro6 AWD
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
79.0 L / 20.9 gal
Passengers
8
5
5 / 7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 330 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 333 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
203 mm / 8.0 in
Size | Length
4770 mm / 187.8 in
Size | Width
1994 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Wheelbase
2774 mm / 109.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Powertrain
Emission Standard
ULEV-2
Engine
J35Z4
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc
Engine | Power
253.0 hp / 188.7 kW @ 5700 rpm
Engine | Redline
6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
72.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
93.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Torque
343 Nm / 253.0 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Production
Availability
2008 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
34%
37%
45%
Pros
- Some offroad capabilities
- High cargo capacity
- High engine reliability
- Much improved exterior styling
- Decent drivetrain reliability
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Quite ugly
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Falsely marketed as SUV
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.