Compare Honda CR-V 5 vs Acura MDX 2 vs Acura MDX

Variants
1.5 173
1.5 173 AWD
1.5 190 AWD CVT
1.5 190 CVT
1.5 193 AWD CVT
1.6d 120 AT
1.6d 120 AWD AT
1.6d 160 AWD
1.6d 160 AWD AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 Hybrid AWD
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD
2.4 AWD CVT
2.4 CVT
3.5 228
3.5 243
3.5 256
3.5 263

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft ~ 2308 L / 81.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
9.2 L / 9.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
79.5 L / 21.0 gal
73.0 L / 19.3 gal
Passengers
7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
P255/55 R18
235/65 R17

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1732 mm / 68.2 in
Size | Length
4844 mm / 190.7 in
Size | Width
1994 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1685.0 mm / 66.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
1690.0 mm / 66.5 in
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine
J37A1
Engine | Bore
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
3.7 L / 223.6 cu-in / 3664.0 cc
Engine | Power
304.0 hp / 226.7 kW @ 6000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
83.0 hp/L / 1.4 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
275 Nm / 202.8 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2007 ~ 2013

Reviews

Neofiliac score
41%
50%
39%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good engine reliability
  • Good engine reliability
  • Much improved styling
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible CVT
  • Questionable automatic transmission
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.