Compare Honda CR-V 5 vs Subaru Crosstrek 2 vs Subaru Outback 4
Variants
1.5 173
1.5 173 AWD
1.5 190 AWD CVT
1.5 190 CVT
1.5 193 AWD CVT
1.6d 120 AT
1.6d 120 AWD AT
1.6d 160 AWD
1.6d 160 AWD AT
2.0 AWD CVT
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 Hybrid AWD
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d
2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD
2.4 AWD CVT
2.4 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0 PHEV CVT
2.0d
2.0d CVT
2.5
2.5 AT
3.6R
Limited 2.5
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Passengers
5
5
Payload
426 kg / 939 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/60 R17
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
221 mm / 8.7 in
200 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
41%
49%
41%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Good engine reliability
- Some offroad capability
- Not very ugly
- Good cargo capacity
- Not as ugly as before
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible CVT
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- CVT
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Outdated automatic transmission
- CVT
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.