HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi Q7 II vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Audi Q3 F3

Variants
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI Euro6d
35 TFSI Euro6d DCT
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI quattro DCT
40 TDI Euro6d quattro DCT
40 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5 / 7
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
13.1 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
31.0 deg
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
17.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.3 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Size | Width
1968 mm / 77.5 in | 2212 mm / 87.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1679.0 mm / 66.1 in
1584.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1691.0 mm / 66.6 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2994 mm / 117.9 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2680 mm / 105.5 in

Performance

Electric Range
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
61.0 km / 37.9 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
27%
37%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
Cons
  • No more 8+ cylinder models
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Very ugly
  • FWD-based
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Crossover nonsense
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.