HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi Q7 II vs Volvo XC60 II vs Toyota RAV4 V

Variants
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
2.0 149
2.0 149 AWD CVT
2.0 149 CVT
2.0 175
2.0 175 AWD
2.0 175 AWD CVT
2.0 175 CVT
2.5 200 AWD AT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD (US)
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.5 D-4S PHEV AWD
RAV4 Prime
RAV4 TRD

Capacity

Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5 / 7
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
13.1 deg
19.0 deg
21.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
31.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
17.3 kWh (gross)
18.8 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
210 mm / 8.3 in
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1658 mm / 65.3 in
Size | Width
1968 mm / 77.5 in | 2212 mm / 87.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1679.0 mm / 66.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1691.0 mm / 66.6 in
Wheelbase
2994 mm / 117.9 in
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.32
Electric Range
56.0 km / 34.8 mi
18.6 km / 11.6 mi
75.0 km / 46.6 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic

Production

Availability
2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
57%
48%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
Cons
  • No more 8+ cylinder models
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • No powerful engine options
  • Uninspiring

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.