Compare Audi Q7 II (4M) vs Volvo XC60 II (SPA) vs Subaru Forester 5 (SK)

Audi Q7 II (4M)

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)

Subaru Forester 5 (SK)

Audi Q7 II (4M)Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Subaru Forester 5 (SK)
Variants
2.0 TFSI
3.0 TDI 249
3.0 TDI 272
3.0 TFSI
3.0 ultra TDI 218
45 TDI MHEV
50 TDI MHEV
e-tron 3.0 TDI
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
2.0 e-Boxer
2.5

Reviews

Neofiliac score74%57%32%
Pros
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
  • Good towing capacity
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • High cargo capacity
  • Still available with naturally-aspirated H4 engines
Cons
  • No more 8+ cylinder models
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • No manual transmission
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.