Compare Acura RDX 3 vs Ford Kuga 2 vs Acura MDX 4

Variants
1.5 120
1.5 150
1.5 182 4x4 AT
1.5 TDCI 120
1.5 TDCI 120 AT
1.6 150
1.6 150 4x4 AT
1.6 182 4x4 AT
2.0 242 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCi 140
2.0 TDCi 140 4x4
2.0 TDCi 140 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCI 150
2.0 TDCI 150 4x4
2.0 TDCI 150 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCi 163 4x4
2.0 TDCi 163 4x4 AT
2.0 TDCI 180 4x4
2.0 TDCI 180 4x4 AT
FWD
SH-AWD
Type S

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
835 L / 29.5 cu-ft
462 L / 16.3 cu-ft ~ 2690 L / 95.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
5.4 L / 5.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 330.2 mm
Chassis Type
Unibody
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
255/45 R20
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
12.3 m / 40.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Size | Height
1669 mm / 65.7 in
1704 mm / 67.1 in
Size | Length
4747 mm / 186.9 in
5039 mm / 198.4 in
Size | Width
1880 mm / 74.0 in
1999 mm / 78.7 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
Wheel Size
20 in
Wheelbase
2751 mm / 108.3 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2891 mm / 113.8 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine
K20C4
J30AC
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 122.0 cu-in / 2000.0 cc
3.0 L / 182.9 cu-in / 2997.0 cc
Engine | Power
272.0 hp / 202.8 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
136.0 hp/L / 2.2 hp/cu-in
118.5 hp/L / 1.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
380 Nm / 280.3 lb-ft @ 1600-4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
10-speed
6-speed
10-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic SportShift
Automatic SportShift

Production

Availability
2019
2021
Debut
2020-10-14
Made In
USA

Reviews

Neofiliac score
45%
19%
47%
Pros
  • Comfortable
  • Decent drivetrain reliability
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Questionable drivetrain longevity
  • Gaping front grille
  • Uglier than the original
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor offroad capabilities for an SUV

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.