Compare Jaguar E-Pace vs Jaguar E-Pace facelift vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2 facelift

Variants
D150
D150 AWD
D150 AWD AT
D180 AWD
D180 AWD AT
D240 AWD AT
P200 AWD AT
P250 AWD AT
P300 AWD AT
P160
P300e AWD
D165 MT
D165 AWD
D200 AWD
P200 AWD
P250 AWD
P300 AWD
1.4 TSI eHybrid DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 190 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 245 4MOTION DSG
Tiguan R
1.5 TSI 150 DSG R-Line
2.0 TDI 150 4MOTION DSG R-Line

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
1234 L / 43.6 cu-ft ~ 2577 L / 91.0 cu-ft
601 L / 21.2 cu-ft ~ 1386 L / 48.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
22.8 deg
22.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
20.7 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
29.4 deg
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/55 R19, 245/45 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.6 ft
11.6 m / 38.1 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in
500 mm / 19.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.0 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross) | 10.4 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
204 mm / 8.0 in
212 mm / 8.3 in
201 mm / 7.9 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1648 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4395 mm / 173.0 in
4395 mm / 173.0 in
Size | Width
1984 mm / 78.1 in | 2088 mm / 82.2 in (mirror unfolded)
1984 mm / 78.1 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
1625.0 mm / 64.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
1624.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17, 8.0J x 18, 8.0J x 19, 8.0J x 20, 8.0J x 21
Wheelbase
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in

Performance

Electric Range
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
59.0 km / 36.7 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
92.3 mm / 3.6 in

Production

Availability
2018 ~ 2020
2020
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
35%
19%
Pros
  • High cargo capacity
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Decent engines
  • Down to very low 1.8L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low build quality
  • Very ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Horrible suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.