Compare Jaguar F-Pace vs BMW X6 M E71 vs BMW X4 M F98
Variants
2.0 250 AT
2.0 250 AWD AT
2.0 300 AWD AT
2.0d 163
2.0d 180
2.0d 180 AT
2.0d 180 AWD
2.0d 180 AWD AT
2.0d 240 AWD AT
20d 180 AT
20d 180 AWD AT
25d 240 AWD AT
25t 250 AWD AT
3.0 340 AWD AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0d 300 AWD AT
30d 300 AWD AT
30t 300 AWD AT
E-Performance 2.0d 163
SVR AWD AT
6AT
8AT
X4 M
X4 M Competition
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
570 L / 20.1 cu-ft ~ 1450 L / 51.2 cu-ft
525 L / 18.5 cu-ft ~ 1430 L / 50.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
17.0 L / 18.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
7.0 L / 7.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
530 kg / 1168 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.8 m / 42.0 ft
12.6 m / 41.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Size | Length
4758 mm / 187.3 in
Size | Width
1983 mm / 78.1 in
1927 mm / 75.9 in | 2138 mm / 84.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1660.0 mm / 65.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1672.0 mm / 65.8 in
1632.0 mm / 64.3 in
Weight
2380.0 kg / 5247.0 lbs
1970.0 kg / 4343.1 lbs
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2933 mm / 115.5 in
2864 mm / 112.8 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.7 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.5 sec
CO2 Emission
239 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.36
Fuel Economy
13.9 L/100km / 16.9 MPG (combined) | 19.3 L/100km / 12.2 MPG (urban) | 10.8 L/100km / 21.8 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2500 kg / 5512 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6d-Temp
Engine
S63B44
S58B30
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
84.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.3:1
9.3:1
Engine | Displacement
4.4 L / 268.2 cu-in / 4395.0 cc
3.0 L / 182.6 cu-in / 2993.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
90.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Type
Twin-scroll turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Steptronic
Production
Availability
2019 ~ 2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
82%
57%
59%
Pros
- Rather quick
- Good exterior styling
- Lots of power when equipped with the supercharged V8
- Lots of power and torque
- Prestige of BMW M
- Superb S58 twin-turbo I6 engine
Cons
- Not a real SUV
- Ugly
- Compromised form for compromised function
- Exceptionally unreliable
- Very high fuel consumption
- Very ugly indeed
- High 0.36 drag coefficient
- Why not buy an M4?
- X3 M is better in every way
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.