Compare Jaguar F-Pace vs BMW X6 M E71 vs BMW X1 E84
Variants
2.0 250 AT
2.0 250 AWD AT
2.0 300 AWD AT
2.0d 163
2.0d 180
2.0d 180 AT
2.0d 180 AWD
2.0d 180 AWD AT
2.0d 240 AWD AT
20d 180 AT
20d 180 AWD AT
25d 240 AWD AT
25t 250 AWD AT
3.0 340 AWD AT
3.0 380 AWD AT
3.0d 300 AWD AT
30d 300 AWD AT
30t 300 AWD AT
E-Performance 2.0d 163
SVR AWD AT
6AT
8AT
sDrive18d
sDrive18i
sDrive20d AT
sDrive20i
xDrive18d
xDrive20d AT
xDrive20i
xDrive23d
xDrive25i AT
xDrive28i
xDrive28i AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
570 L / 20.1 cu-ft ~ 1450 L / 51.2 cu-ft
420 L / 14.8 cu-ft ~ 1350 L / 47.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
17.0 L / 18.0 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
8.5 L / 9.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
12.8 m / 42.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Size | Width
1983 mm / 78.1 in
Track Width | Front
1660.0 mm / 65.4 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1672.0 mm / 65.8 in
1529.0 mm / 60.2 in
Weight
2380.0 kg / 5247.0 lbs
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
Wheelbase
2874 mm / 113.1 in
2933 mm / 115.5 in
2760 mm / 108.7 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
4.7 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
4.5 sec
Fuel Economy
13.9 L/100km / 16.9 MPG (combined) | 19.3 L/100km / 12.2 MPG (urban) | 10.8 L/100km / 21.8 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5
Engine
S63B44
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.3:1
10.7:1
Engine | Displacement
4.4 L / 268.2 cu-in / 4395.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
82%
57%
34%
Pros
- Rather quick
- Good exterior styling
- Lots of power when equipped with the supercharged V8
- Lots of power and torque
- Prestige of BMW M
- Manual transmission widely available
- Good N52 I6 engine
Cons
- Not a real SUV
- Ugly
- Compromised form for compromised function
- Exceptionally unreliable
- Very high fuel consumption
- MacPherson front suspensions
- Horrible N47 and N20 engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.