Compare Chrysler Aspen vs Nissan Armada
Variants
4.7 4WD
4.7
4.7 FlexFuel 4WD
4.7 FlexFuel
5.7 335 4WD
5.7 335
5.7 376 4WD
5.7 376
5.7 Hybrid 4WD
5.6 317 4WD
5.6 317
5.6 305
5.6 309 4WD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
566 L / 20.0 cu-ft ~ 2750 L / 97.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
102.0 L / 26.9 gal
106.0 L / 28.0 gal
Passengers
8
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 336x28 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 352x22 mm
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
265/70 R18
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
250 mm / 9.8 in
Size | Height
1913 mm / 75.3 in
Size | Length
5255 mm / 206.9 in
Size | Width
2002 mm / 78.8 in
Track Width | Front
1637.0 mm / 64.4 in
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1715.0 mm / 67.5 in
Wheel Size
18 in
Wheelbase
3027 mm / 119.2 in
3130 mm / 123.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.391
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
185.0 km/h / 115.0 mph
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
98.0 mm / 3.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.8:1
Engine | Displacement
5.6 L / 338.8 cu-in / 5552.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
65%
60%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Powerful engines
- Solid on-road performance
- High cargo capacity
- Very imposing exterior
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- High 0.39 drag coefficient
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Very high fuel consumption
- Poor handling
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.