Compare Chrysler Aspen vs Cadillac Escalade 2
Variants
4.7 4WD
4.7
4.7 FlexFuel 4WD
4.7 FlexFuel
5.7 335 4WD
5.7 335
5.7 376 4WD
5.7 376
5.7 Hybrid 4WD
5.3 288
5.3 299
6.0 AWD
ESV 6.0 AWD
6.2
ESV 6.2
Capacity
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
102.0 L / 26.9 gal
Passengers
8
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 336x28 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 352x22 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Solid axle
Solid axle
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Track Width | Front
1637.0 mm / 64.4 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
Wheelbase
3027 mm / 119.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.391
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Engine | Stroke
92.0 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 engine with 2 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
65%
70%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Powerful engines
- Solid on-road performance
- Very high cargo capacity
- Superb exterior styling
Cons
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- High 0.39 drag coefficient
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Poor offroad capabilities for an SUV
- Very high fuel consumption
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.