Compare Opel Meriva A vs BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 vs Ford C-MAX 2

Opel Meriva A / Chevrolet Meriva / Vauxhall Meriva Minivan (2002-2009)

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 Minivan (2014-2018)

Opel | Cars

BMW | Cars

Ford | Cars

Variants

1.3D 70

1.3D 75

1.4

1.6 100 AT

1.6 105

1.6 105 AT

1.6 87

1.7D 100

1.7D 101

1.7D 125

1.7D 75

1.8

1.8 AT

OPC

214d

216d

218d

218d AT

218i

218i AT

220d

220d AT

220d xDrive AT

220i

220i AT

225i AT

225i xDrive AT

225xe xDrive AT

1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.0 EcoBoost 125 Euro6

1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT

1.5 EcoBoost 150

1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT

1.5 ECOnetic 105

1.5 TDCi 120

1.5 TDCi 120 AT

1.5 TDCi 95

1.6 Duratec 105

1.6 Duratec 125

1.6 TDCi 115

1.6 TDCi 95

1.6 EcoBoost 150

1.6 TDCi 115 Euro6

1.6 120

1.6 85

2.0 188 PHEV

2.0 TDCi 140

2.0 TDCi 140 AT

2.0 TDCi 163

2.0 TDCi 163 AT

2.0 TDCi 150 AT

2.0 TDCi 150

2.0 TDCi 170 AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity

8.0 L / 8.5 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.3 L / 4.5 qt

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent

Multi-link

Turning Circle

11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

7.6 kWh (gross) | 5.8 kWh (net)

7.6 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

293.0 V

Body Style

5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

140 mm / 5.5 in

Size | Height

1624 mm / 63.9 in

Size | Length

4342 mm / 170.9 in

Size | Width

1694 mm / 66.7 in

1800 mm / 70.9 in

Track Width | Front

1449.0 mm / 57.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1464.0 mm / 57.6 in

Wheelbase

2630 mm / 103.5 in

2670 mm / 105.1 in

2649 mm / 104.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.32

Towing Capacity

400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 4

Euro 6

Reviews

Neofiliac score

16%

34%

23%

Pros

OPC model avaiable

Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Low official fuel consumption
Lots of space inside

Low fuel consumption

Cons

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Somewhat ugly

Poor performance
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.