Compare BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 vs Ford S-MAX 2 facelift vs Ford Grand C-MAX

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer F45 Minivan (2014-2018)

BMW | Cars

Ford | Cars

Variants

214d

216d

218d

218d AT

218i

218i AT

220d

220d AT

220d xDrive AT

220i

220i AT

225i AT

225i xDrive AT

225xe xDrive AT

1.5 EcoBoost 165

2.0 EcoBlue 150

2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT

2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT

2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT

2.0 EcoBlue 240 AT

2.5 190 Hybrid

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 100 Euro6

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.5 EcoBoost 150

1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT

1.5 EcoBoost 182 AT

1.5 TDCi 120

1.5 TDCi 120 AT

1.5 TDCi 95

1.6 TDCi 115

1.6 Ti-VCT 120

2.0 TDCi 150

2.0 TDCi 150 AT

2.0 TDCi 170 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

5 / 7

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Disc

Brakes | Rear

Drum

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Tire Size

205/55 R16, 215/55 R16, 215/50 R17, 235/40 R18

Turning Circle

11.3 m / 37.1 ft

11.9 m / 39.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

7.6 kWh (gross) | 5.8 kWh (net)

1.1 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

293.0 V

Body Style

5-door Minivan

Dimensions

Size | Length

4342 mm / 170.9 in

Size | Width

1800 mm / 70.9 in

1916 mm / 75.4 in | 2137 mm / 84.1 in (mirror unfolded) | 1953 mm / 76.9 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1606.0 mm / 63.2 in

Track Width | Rear

1606.0 mm / 63.2 in

Wheelbase

2670 mm / 105.1 in

2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6

Engine | Bore

89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

13.0:1

Engine | Displacement

2.5 L / 151.8 cu-in / 2488.0 cc

Engine | Specific Output

60.3 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in

Engine | Stroke

100.0 mm / 3.9 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

34%

24%

Pros

Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Low official fuel consumption
Lots of space inside

High cargo capacity
Decent engine reliability

Decent engine reliability

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Somewhat ugly

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Basic suspension setup
Ugly

Poor performance
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.