Compare Fiat Bravo 198 vs Fiat 500 facelift vs Lexus CT 200h facelift

Fiat Bravo (Type 198) Hatchback (2007-2014)

Lexus CT 200h (ZWA10) facelift Hatchback (2017)

Fiat | Cars

Lexus | Cars

Variants

1.4

1.4 MultiAir

1.4 T-Jet 120

1.4 T-Jet 150

1.6 Multijet 105

1.6 Multijet 120

1.6 Multijet 90

1.9 MultiJet 120

1.9 MultiJet 150

2.0 Multijet

0.9 TwinAir 105

0.9 TwinAir 85

0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d

0.9 TwinAir 85 AT

0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT

1.0 70

1.2 69

1.2 69 Euro6d

1.2 69 AT

1.2 69 Euro6d AT

1.3 MultiJet 95

1.4 MultiAir 135

1.4 MultiAir 135 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

400 L / 14.1 cu-ft ~ 1175 L / 41.5 cu-ft

405 L / 14.3 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

57.0 L / 15.1 gal

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Payload

510 kg / 1124 lbs

424 kg / 935 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent

Double-wishbone

Tire Size

215/45 R17

Turning Circle

10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

5-door hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

114 mm / 4.5 in

145 mm / 5.7 in

Size | Height

1498 mm / 59.0 in

1455 mm / 57.3 in

Size | Length

4336 mm / 170.7 in

4351 mm / 171.3 in

Size | Width

1792 mm / 70.6 in

1765 mm / 69.5 in

Track Width | Front

1538.0 mm / 60.6 in

1524.0 mm / 60.0 in

Track Width | Rear

1532.0 mm / 60.3 in

1519.0 mm / 59.8 in

Weight

1420.0 kg / 3130.6 lbs

Wheel Size

7.0J x 17

Wheelbase

2600 mm / 102.4 in

2300 mm / 90.6 in

2601 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h

10.3 sec

Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph

9.8 sec

CO2 Emission

101 g/km

Coefficient Of Drag

0.362

0.29

Fuel Economy

4.4 L/100km / 53.5 MPG (combined) | 4.7 L/100km / 50.0 MPG (urban) | 4.1 L/100km / 57.4 MPG (highway)

Top Speed

180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine

2ZR-FXE

Engine | Bore

80.5 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

13.0:1

Engine | Displacement

1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc

Engine | Power

98.0 hp / 73.1 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)

Engine | Redline

6500 rpm

Engine | Specific Output

54.5 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in

Engine | Stroke

88.4 mm / 3.5 in

Engine | Torque

142 Nm / 104.7 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm

Engine | Type

multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Type

e-CVT

Production

Availability

2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score

28%

25%

27%

Pros

Small turning circle
Decent, punchy engines
Good manual transmission

Great styling
Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Small turning circle
Good reliability

Cons

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Horrible performance
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
High 0.36 drag coefficient
Poor suspension setup

Poor performance
Miserably low engine output
Horrible to drive

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.