HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Fiesta 7 vs Hyundai i30 III Hatchback facelift vs Hyundai i20 II Coupe

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 100 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 140
1.0 EcoBoost 155 MHEV
1.0 EcoBoost 95
1.1 70
1.1 85
1.1 Ti-VCT 75
1.5D 120
1.5D 85
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
1.0 T-GDi
1.0 T-GDi DCT
1.5 DPi
1.5 T-GDi
1.5 T-GDi DCT
1.6 CRDi 115
1.6 CRDi 115 DCT
1.6 CRDi 136
1.6 CRDi 136 DCT
i30 N Performance
i30 N Performance DCT
1.0 T-GDI
1.2
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 CRDi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
336 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1011 L / 35.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
42.0 L / 11.1 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
423 kg / 933 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 345 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 314 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
235/35 R19 Y
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.2 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
3- / 5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
133 mm / 5.2 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1449 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
4340 mm / 170.9 in
4045 mm / 159.3 in
Size | Width
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1730 mm / 68.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
Weight
1070.0 kg / 2358.9 lbs
Wheel Size
8.0J x 19
Wheelbase
2493 mm / 98.1 in
2650 mm / 104.3 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
34.6 m / 113.5 ft
CO2 Emission
112 g/km
Fuel Economy
4.8 L/100km / 49.0 MPG (combined) | 6.0 L/100km / 39.2 MPG (urban) | 4.1 L/100km / 57.4 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Stroke
86.0 mm / 3.4 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
19%
32%
17%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent build quality
  • Decent performance
  • Good handling
  • Small turning circle
  • Sleek styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor durability

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.