Compare Ford Focus 4 vs Subaru Impreza 5 Hatchback facelift vs Lexus CT 200h
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 155
1.0 EcoBoost 85
1.5 EcoBlue 120
1.5 EcoBlue 120 AT
1.5 EcoBlue 95
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 150 AT
1.5 EcoBoost 182
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
ST 2.0 EcoBlue
ST 2.3 EcoBoost
ST 2.3 EcoBoost AT
1.6
2.0
Euro6
Euro5
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft ~ 985 L / 34.8 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.9 L / 7.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.2 L / 4.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door hybrid Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
112 mm / 4.4 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Length
4475 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1825 mm / 71.9 in | 1979 mm / 77.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1848 mm / 72.8 in (mirror folded)
1765 mm / 69.5 in
Track Width | Front
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
10.3 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.8 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine
2ZR-FXE
Engine | Bore
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
13.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1798.0 cc
Engine | Power
99.0 hp / 73.8 kW @ 5200 rpm + 82.0 hp / 61.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Specific Output
55.1 hp/L / 0.9 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
88.3 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Type
Lineartronic
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
61%
37%
31%
Pros
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Very low fuel consumption
- Strong styling
- Independent rear suspensions
- Overall good styling
- Characterful flat-4 engine
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Poor performance
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- CVT
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Poor handling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.