HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Focus 3 vs Toyota Matrix 2 vs Toyota Matrix E130

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182
1.5D 120
1.5D 95
1.5D 105
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 EcoBoost 182
1.6D 105
1.6D 115
1.6D 115
1.6D 95
1.6 105
1.6 125
1.6 125 AT
1.6 85
2.0D 140
2.0D 140 AT
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
RS 350 AWD
ST 250
ST TDCi 185
Automatic
AWD Automatic
Manual
1.8 124PS AWD
1.8 124PS AWD AT
1.8 132PS
1.8 132PS AT
1.8 183PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft ~ 1398 L / 49.4 cu-ft
617 L / 21.8 cu-ft ~ 1507 L / 53.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc, 295 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 277 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16 89H
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
325.0 V
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1540 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4394 mm / 173.0 in
4350 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1765 mm / 69.5 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1519.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Wheel Size
16 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2601 mm / 102.4 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Engine
2AZ-FE I4
Engine | Bore
88.5 mm / 3.5 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
2.4 L / 144.1 cu-in / 2362.0 cc
Engine | Power
160.0 hp / 119.3 kW @ 5600 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
67.7 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Torque
225 Nm / 166.0 lb-ft @ 4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2008 ~ 2014
2002 ~ 2007

Reviews

Neofiliac score
55%
24%
16%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Potent engine lineup
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Decent exterior design
  • Good drivetrain reliability
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable engines
Cons
  • Generic design
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Boring design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.