HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Focus 3 vs Toyota Avensis 2 Liftback vs Toyota Matrix E130

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 100
1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 150
1.5 EcoBoost 182
1.5D 120
1.5D 95
1.5D 105
1.6 EcoBoost 150
1.6 EcoBoost 182
1.6D 105
1.6D 115
1.6D 115
1.6D 95
1.6 105
1.6 125
1.6 125 AT
1.6 85
2.0D 140
2.0D 140 AT
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
RS 350 AWD
ST 250
ST TDCi 185
1.6 VVT-i
1.8 VVT-i
1.8 VVT-i AT
2.0 D-4D 116
2.0 D-4D 147
2.0 D-4D 147 AT
1.8 124PS AWD
1.8 124PS AWD AT
1.8 132PS
1.8 132PS AT
1.8 183PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
510 L / 18.0 cu-ft ~ 1320 L / 46.6 cu-ft
617 L / 21.8 cu-ft ~ 1507 L / 53.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
325.0 V
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1540 mm / 60.6 in
Size | Length
4630 mm / 182.3 in
4350 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1505.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability
2003 ~ 2009
2002 ~ 2007

Reviews

Neofiliac score
55%
24%
16%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Potent engine lineup
  • Fully independent suspensions
  • Good engine reliability
  • Good front-end design
  • Lots of space inside
  • Small turning circle
  • Reliable engines
Cons
  • Generic design
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Boring design

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.