Compare Ford Focus 3 vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta facelift vs Alfa Romeo MiTo

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (940) facelift Hatchback (2015-2020)

Alfa Romeo MiTo (955) Hatchback (2008-2013)

Ford | Cars

Alfa Romeo | Cars

Variants

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.5 EcoBoost 150

1.5 EcoBoost 182

1.5D 120

1.5D 95

1.5D 105

1.6 EcoBoost 150

1.6 EcoBoost 182

1.6D 105

1.6D 115

1.6D 95

1.6 105

1.6 125

1.6 125 AT

1.6 85

2.0D 140

2.0D 140 AT

2.0D 150 AT

2.0D 150

2.0D 163

2.0D 163 AT

RS 350 AWD

ST 250

ST TDCi 185

1.4 TB 120

1.4 TB 120 Euro6d

1.4 TB MultiAir 150

1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT

1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d

1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d TCT

1.6 MultiJet 120

1.6 MultiJet 120 TCT

1.75 TBi

2.0 MultiJet 170 Euro6d TCT

2.0 MultiJet 150

2.0 MultiJet 175 TCT

0.9 TwinAir 105

0.9 TwinAir 85

1.3 JTD 90

1.3 JTD 85

1.4

1.4 MPI

1.4 TB MultiAir 105

1.4 TB MultiAir 135

1.4 TB 120

1.4 TB 155

1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT

1.4 TB MultiAir 170

1.6 JTD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

350 L / 12.4 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Turning Circle

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

325.0 V

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height

1465 mm / 57.7 in

Size | Length

4351 mm / 171.3 in

Size | Width

1798 mm / 70.8 in

1720 mm / 67.7 in

Track Width | Front

1554.0 mm / 61.2 in

1483.0 mm / 58.4 in

Track Width | Rear

1554.0 mm / 61.2 in

1475.0 mm / 58.1 in

Wheelbase

2511 mm / 98.9 in

Performance

Towing Capacity

300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score

55%

46%

25%

Pros

Low fuel consumption
Potent engine lineup
Fully independent suspensions

Low official fuel consumption
Sweet design

Low official fuel consumption
Beautiful design

Cons

Generic design

More emission nonsense causing reliability concerns
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

No powerful engine options
Very tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.