Compare Ford Focus 3 vs Mercedes A-Class W176 vs Mercedes C-Class SportCoupe

Mercedes-Benz A-Class W176 Hatchback (2012-2015)

Mercedes-Benz C-Class SportCoupe CL203 Hatchback (2000-2008)

Ford | Cars

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Variants

1.0 EcoBoost 100

1.0 EcoBoost 125 AT

1.0 EcoBoost 125

1.5 EcoBoost 150

1.5 EcoBoost 182

1.5D 120

1.5D 95

1.5D 105

1.6 EcoBoost 150

1.6 EcoBoost 182

1.6D 105

1.6D 115

1.6D 95

1.6 105

1.6 125

1.6 125 AT

1.6 85

2.0D 140

2.0D 140 AT

2.0D 150 AT

2.0D 150

2.0D 163

2.0D 163 AT

RS 350 AWD

ST 250

ST TDCi 185

A 160 CDI

A 160 CDI DCT

A 180

A 180 BlueEFFICIENCY

A 180 DCT

A 180 CDI

A 180 CDI DCT

A 200

A 200 DCT

A 200 CDI

A 200 CDI DCT

A 220 CDI DCT

A 250 4MATIC

A 250 DCT

A 250 4MATIC DCT

A 45 AMG

C 30 CDI AMG AT

C 32 AMG AT

C 160

C 160 AT

C 180

C 180 AT

C 180 Kompressor

C 180 Kompressor AT

C 200 CDI

C 200 CDI AT

C 200 CGI

C 200 Kompressor Euro4

C 200 Kompressor

C 200 Kompressor Euro4 AT

C 200 Kompressor AT

C 220 CDI

C 220 CDI AT

C 220 CDI Euro4

C 220 CDI Euro4 AT

C 230

C 230 AT

C 230 Kompressor Euro4

C 230 Kompressor Euro4 AT

C 230 Kompressor

C 230 Kompressor AT

C 320

C 320 AT

C 350

C 350 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

341 L / 12.0 cu-ft ~ 1157 L / 40.9 cu-ft

310 L / 10.9 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

62.0 L / 16.4 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Trailing arm

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.8 m / 35.3 ft

Construction

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Battery | Voltage

325.0 V

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Size | Height

1433 mm / 56.4 in

Size | Length

4292 mm / 169.0 in

4343 mm / 171.0 in

Size | Width

1780 mm / 70.1 in

Track Width | Front

1553.0 mm / 61.1 in

Track Width | Rear

1552.0 mm / 61.1 in

Wheelbase

2699 mm / 106.3 in

2715 mm / 106.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.29

Towing Capacity

300 kg / 661 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score

55%

42%

34%

Pros

Low fuel consumption
Potent engine lineup
Fully independent suspensions

Low official fuel consumption
Much improved styling
Much improved fit and finish

RWD-based
Fully independent suspensions

Cons

Generic design

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
4-cylinder AMG

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Horrible AMGs

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.