Compare Audi A3 Sportback 8V facelift vs Mercedes A-Class W176 vs Mercedes B-Class W247
Variants
1.0 TFSI
1.0 TFSI DCT
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI DCT
1.5 TFSI
1.5 TFSI DCT
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 110 DCT
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 116 DCT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DCT
2.0 TDI 150 quattro
2.0 TDI 184 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI DCT
2.0 TFSI quattro DCT
30 TDI
30 TDI DCT
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
e-tron 1.4 TFSI DCT
g-tron 1.4 TFSI
g-tron 1.4 TFSI DCT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI DCT
A 180
A 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
A 180 DCT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI DCT
A 200
A 200 DCT
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI DCT
A 220 CDI DCT
A 250 4MATIC
A 250 DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 45 AMG
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
341 L / 12.0 cu-ft ~ 1157 L / 40.9 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Trailing arm
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
8.8 kWh (gross) | 7.0 kWh (net)
15.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1433 mm / 56.4 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4292 mm / 169.0 in
4419 mm / 174.0 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in
Performance
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Powertrain
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT
Production
Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
42%
27%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Manual transmission widely available
- Low official fuel consumption
- Much improved styling
- Much improved fit and finish
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Better-looking than before
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny or small engines
- Semi-independent rear suspensions in FWD models
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- 4-cylinder AMG
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
- Utilitarian
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.