HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi A3 Sportback 8V facelift vs Peugeot 308 vs Peugeot 308 III

Variants
1.0 TFSI
1.0 TFSI DCT
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI DCT
1.5 TFSI
1.5 TFSI DCT
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 110 DCT
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 116 DCT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DCT
2.0 TDI 150 quattro
2.0 TDI 184 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI DCT
2.0 TFSI quattro DCT
30 TDI
30 TDI DCT
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
e-tron 1.4 TFSI DCT
g-tron 1.4 TFSI
g-tron 1.4 TFSI DCT
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 98
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 150 AT
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 156 AT
1.6 THP 175
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 163 AT
GTi 200
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Torsion
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
8.8 kWh (gross) | 7.0 kWh (net)
12.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
Size | Length
4276 mm / 168.3 in
4367 mm / 171.9 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Wheelbase
2608 mm / 102.7 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.28
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
EB2DTS
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm

Production

Availability
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
42%
18%
26%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Manual transmission widely available
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny or small engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions in FWD models
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.