Compare Audi A3 Sportback 8V facelift vs Mini Hatch R56 vs Mini Countryman F60
Variants
1.0 TFSI
1.0 TFSI DCT
1.4 TFSI
1.4 TFSI DCT
1.5 TFSI
1.5 TFSI DCT
1.6 TDI 110
1.6 TDI 110 DCT
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 116 DCT
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DCT
2.0 TDI 150 quattro
2.0 TDI 184 quattro DCT
2.0 TFSI
2.0 TFSI DCT
2.0 TFSI quattro DCT
30 TDI
30 TDI DCT
30 TFSI
30 TFSI DCT
35 TDI DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
e-tron 1.4 TFSI DCT
g-tron 1.4 TFSI
g-tron 1.4 TFSI DCT
Cooper 122PS
Cooper 122PS AT
Cooper 120PS
Cooper D 110PS
Cooper D 110PS AT
Cooper D 112PS
Cooper D 112PS AT
Cooper S 184PS
Cooper S 184PS AT
Cooper S 175PS
Cooper SD
Cooper SD AT
JCW
One 75PS
One MINIMALIST 75PS
One 98PS
One 98PS AT
One MINIMALIST 98PS
One D
Cooper
Cooper Euro6d
Cooper ALL4
Cooper ALL4 AT
Cooper 1.5 Euro6d AT
Cooper 1.5 AT
Cooper D
Cooper D Euro6d
Cooper D Euro6d ALL4
Cooper D ALL4
Cooper D ALL4 AT
Cooper D Euro6d ALL4 AT
Cooper D AT
Cooper D Euro6d AT
Cooper S Euro6d
Cooper S
Cooper S ALL4
Cooper S ALL4 AT
Cooper S AT
Cooper S Euro6d AT
Cooper S E ALL4
Cooper S E ALL4 Euro6d
Cooper SD Euro6d ALL4 AT
Cooper SD ALL4 AT
Cooper SD Euro6d AT
Cooper SD AT
JCW
JCW AT
One Euro6d
One
One AT
One Euro6d AT
One D
One D Euro6d
One D Euro6d AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
160 L / 5.7 cu-ft ~ 680 L / 24.0 cu-ft
Passengers
5
4
5
Payload
450 kg / 992 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
8.8 kWh (gross) | 7.0 kWh (net)
7.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1407 mm / 55.4 in
Size | Length
4299 mm / 169.3 in
Size | Width
1683 mm / 66.3 in
1822 mm / 71.7 in
Track Width | Front
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheelbase
2467 mm / 97.1 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
26%
26%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Manual transmission widely available
- Iconic design
- Low official fuel consumption
- Improved styling
- Improved engine reliability
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with tiny or small engines
- Semi-independent rear suspensions in FWD models
- No powerful engine options
- Unreliable small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- PHEV nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.