Compare Chevrolet Volt 2 vs Peugeot 308 II vs Peugeot 308 III

Peugeot 308 II (T9) Hatchback (2013-2021)

Chevrolet | Cars

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d

1.2 PureTech 130 Euro6d

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.2 VTi 82

1.5 BlueHDi 102 Euro6d

1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d

1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d AT

1.6 BlueHDi 100

1.6 BlueHDi 120

1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT

1.6 BlueHDi 99

1.6 e-HDI 115

1.6 HDI 92

1.6 PureTech 225 AT

1.6 THP 125

1.6 THP 156

2.0 BlueHDi 150

2.0 BlueHDi 150 AT

2.0 BlueHDi 177 AT

2.0 e-HDI 150

2.0 e-HDI 150 AT

GT 1.6 THP 205

GT 2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

GTi 263

GTi 250

GTi 270

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.5 BlueHDi 130

1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

301 L / 10.6 cu-ft

Coolant Capacity

7.0 L / 7.4 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.0 L / 4.2 qt

Fuel Capacity

33.7 L / 8.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Ventilated discs

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Torsion

Tire Size

215/50 R17

Turning Circle

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

18.4 kWh (gross)

12.4 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Body Style

5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

110 mm / 4.3 in

140 mm / 5.5 in

Size | Height

1432 mm / 56.4 in

Size | Length

4582 mm / 180.4 in

4253 mm / 167.4 in

4367 mm / 171.9 in

Size | Width

1809 mm / 71.2 in

1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1540.0 mm / 60.6 in

1559.0 mm / 61.4 in

Track Width | Rear

1570.0 mm / 61.8 in

Weight

1607.0 kg / 3542.8 lbs

Wheel Size

7.0J x 17

Wheelbase

2694 mm / 106.1 in

2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.28

Fuel Economy

5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (urban)

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine

EB2DTS

Engine | Bore

74.0 mm / 2.9 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

12.5:1

10.5:1

Engine | Displacement

1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc

Engine | Power

101.0 hp / 75.3 kW @ 5600 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)

Engine | Redline

5600 rpm

Engine | Specific Output

67.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in

Engine | Stroke

86.6 mm / 3.4 in

Engine | Type

direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Type

Multi-mode electric

Production

Availability

2016 ~ 2019

2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score

26%

21%

26%

Pros

Longer range than Mk1

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Improved styling

Cons

Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions
Low cargo capacity

Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Engine durability low

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.