Compare Chevrolet Cruze 2 Hatchback vs Chevrolet Volt vs DS 4 II

Variants
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 Turbo AT
1.6 TD
1.6 TD AT
16.0 kWh
17.1 kWh
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 181 AT
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
E-TENSE

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
300 L / 10.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.3 L / 7.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
3.5 L / 3.7 qt
Fuel Capacity
35.2 L / 9.3 gal
Passengers
5
4
5
Payload
364 kg / 802 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-dependent beam with stabilizer lateral stability, Trailing arm, Coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
215/50 R17
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.8 m / 35.5 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
12.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
189 mm / 7.4 in
Size | Height
1430 mm / 56.3 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4453 mm / 175.3 in
4498 mm / 177.1 in
4400 mm / 173.2 in
Size | Width
1791 mm / 70.5 in
1788 mm / 70.4 in
1866 mm / 73.5 in | 2061 mm / 81.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1556.0 mm / 61.3 in
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Wheel Size
7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Electric Range
55.0 km / 34.2 mi
Fuel Economy
6.3 L/100km / 37.3 MPG (combined)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6.3
Engine | Bore
73.4 mm / 2.9 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.4 L / 85.3 cu-in / 1398.0 cc
Engine | Power
84.0 hp / 62.6 kW @ 4800 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)
Engine | Redline
4800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
60.1 hp/L / 1.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
82.6 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Multi-mode electric
Automatic

Production

Availability
2017 ~ 2018
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
20%
25%
32%
Pros
  • Slightly improved styling
  • Good fuel economy ratings
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Much improved styling
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Complex drivetrain
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.