Compare Nissan Note vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift
Variants
1.4 88
1.4 88 2010+
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 90
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Rigid axle
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Size | Height
1550 mm / 61.0 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4063 mm / 160.0 in
Size | Width
1690 mm / 66.5 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1470.0 mm / 57.9 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1460.0 mm / 57.5 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Production
Availability
2013 ~ 2018
Reviews
Neofiliac score
4%
23%
Pros
- Engine reliability and repair-ability are fine
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Rigid rear axle
- No powerful engine options
- Tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Low cargo capacity
- More emission control systems to fail
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.