Compare Skoda Rapid Spaceback vs Volkswagen Up facelift vs Volkswagen Polo 6

Skoda Rapid Spaceback (NH1) Hatchback (2013-2019)

Volkswagen Up / Skoda Citigo / SEAT Mii facelift Hatchback (2016)

Skoda | Cars

Volkswagen | Cars

Variants

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 TSI 95 AT

1.2 TSI 105

1.2 TSI 110

1.2 TSI 86

1.2 TSI 90

1.2 TSI 90 DSG

1.4 TDI 90

1.4 TDI 90 AT

1.4 TDI 90 DSG

1.4 TSI 122 DSG

1.4 TSI 125 AT

1.4 TSI 125 DSG

1.4i 90

1.6 TDI 105

1.6 TDI 115

1.6 TDI 116

1.6 TDI 90

1.6 TDI 90 DSG

1.6i 110 Hp

1.6i 110 AT

1.0 60

1.0 60 ASG

1.0 75

1.0 75 ASG

1.0 75 Euro6d

1.0 EcoFuel 68

1.0 EcoFuel 68 Euro6d

1.0 MPI 65

1.0 TSI 90

1.0 TSI 90 Euro6d

GTI

GTI Euro6d

1.0 65

1.0 65 Euro6d

1.0 75

1.0 MPI 80

1.0 TGI 90

1.0 TGI 90 Euro6d

1.0 TSI 110

1.0 TSI 110 DSG

1.0 TSI 115

1.0 TSI 115 DSG

1.0 TSI 116

1.0 TSI 116 DSG

1.0 TSI 95 Euro6d

1.0 TSI 95

1.0 TSI 95 Euro6d DSG

1.0 TSI 95 DSG

1.5 TSI 150 DSG

1.6 TDI 80

1.6 TDI 95

1.6 TDI 95 DSG

GTI

GTI DSG

GTI Euro6d DSG

GTI R5 AWD

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.8 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

16.5 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent

Turning Circle

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

9.8 m / 32.1 ft

10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Hatchback

3-5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

134 mm / 5.3 in

144 mm / 5.7 in

Size | Length

3600 mm / 141.7 in

Size | Width

1706 mm / 67.2 in

Track Width | Front

1412.0 mm / 55.6 in

Track Width | Rear

1408.0 mm / 55.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

82.5 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

Engine | Displacement

1.0 L / 61.0 cu-in / 999.0 cc

Engine | Stroke

75.5 mm / 3.0 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score

28%

Pros

Low official fuel consumption

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Low fuel consumption

Cons

Bad 0-100kph time
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions
Very ugly

Horrible performance
Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
Poor suspension setup

Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.