HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 308 II vs Peugeot 207 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo

Variants
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 VTi 82
1.5 BlueHDi 102 Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d AT
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.6 e-HDI 115
1.6 HDI 92
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
1.6 THP 125
1.6 THP 156
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 150 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 177 AT
2.0 e-HDI 150
2.0 e-HDI 150 AT
GT 1.6 THP 205
GT 2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
GTi 263
GTi 250
GTi 270
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
110 mm / 4.3 in
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
4253 mm / 167.4 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
21%
8%
25%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Beautiful design
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Engine durability low
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Very tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.