HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 308 vs Peugeot 207 vs Fiat 500 facelift

Variants
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 98
1.6 e-HDi 112
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 HDi 109
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 150 AT
1.6 THP 156
1.6 THP 156 AT
1.6 THP 175
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
2.0 HDi 136
2.0 HDi 136 AT
2.0 HDi 150
2.0 HDi 163 AT
GTi 200
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d
0.9 TwinAir 85 AT
0.9 TwinAir 85 Euro6d AT
1.0 70
1.2 69
1.2 69 Euro6d
1.2 69 AT
1.2 69 Euro6d AT
1.3 MultiJet 95
1.4 MultiAir 135
1.4 MultiAir 135 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
Size | Height
1498 mm / 59.0 in
1472 mm / 58.0 in
Size | Length
4276 mm / 168.3 in
Track Width | Front
1526.0 mm / 60.1 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1521.0 mm / 59.9 in
Wheelbase
2608 mm / 102.7 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2300 mm / 90.6 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.30
0.362

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
5000 rpm
6500 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
8%
25%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Great styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • Horrible performance
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • High 0.36 drag coefficient
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.