Compare Peugeot 208 vs Peugeot 308 III vs Chevrolet Volt 2

Peugeot | Cars

Chevrolet | Cars

Variants

1.0 PureTech

1.0 PureTech 2016+

1.0 VTi

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 110 AT

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d AT

1.2 PureTech 82

1.2 PureTech 82 AT

1.2 PureTech 82 Euro6d

1.2 VTi 82

1.4 e-HDi

1.4 HDi

1.4 VTi 95

1.5 BlueHDi 102

1.6 BlueHDi 100

1.6 BlueHDi 120

1.6 BlueHDi 75

1.6 e-HDi 115

1.6 e-HDi 92 5MT

1.6 e-HDi 92 6MT

1.6 THP 155

1.6 THP 208

1.6 VTi 120

GTi 200

GTi 208

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.5 BlueHDi 130

1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT

1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

301 L / 10.6 cu-ft

Coolant Capacity

7.0 L / 7.4 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

4.0 L / 4.2 qt

Fuel Capacity

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

33.7 L / 8.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Ventilated discs

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Torsion

Semi-independent, Torsion

Tire Size

215/50 R17

Turning Circle

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

12.4 kWh (gross)

18.4 kWh (gross)

Battery | Type

Lithium-ion

Body Style

5-door plug-in hybrid Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

140 mm / 5.5 in

Size | Height

1432 mm / 56.4 in

Size | Length

4367 mm / 171.9 in

4582 mm / 180.4 in

Size | Width

1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)

1809 mm / 71.2 in

Track Width | Front

1559.0 mm / 61.4 in

1540.0 mm / 60.6 in

Track Width | Rear

1570.0 mm / 61.8 in

Weight

1607.0 kg / 3542.8 lbs

Wheel Size

7.0J x 17

Wheelbase

2538 mm / 99.9 in

2675 mm / 105.3 in

2694 mm / 106.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.28

Fuel Economy

5.6 L/100km / 42.0 MPG (urban)

Towing Capacity

750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine

EB2DTS

Engine | Bore

74.0 mm / 2.9 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

12.5:1

Engine | Displacement

1.5 L / 90.9 cu-in / 1490.0 cc

Engine | Power

101.0 hp / 75.3 kW @ 5600 rpm + 149.0 hp / 111.1 kW (electric motor)

Engine | Redline

5600 rpm

Engine | Specific Output

67.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in

Engine | Stroke

86.6 mm / 3.4 in

Engine | Type

direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Type

Multi-mode electric

Production

Availability

2021

2016 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score

13%

26%

Pros

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption
Improved styling

Longer range than Mk1

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Miserably low engine output
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions
Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.