Compare Peugeot 208 vs Peugeot 308 II vs Peugeot 308

Peugeot 308 II (T9) Hatchback (2013-2021)

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

1.0 PureTech

1.0 PureTech 2016+

1.0 VTi

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 110 AT

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d AT

1.2 PureTech 82

1.2 PureTech 82 AT

1.2 PureTech 82 Euro6d

1.2 VTi 82

1.4 e-HDi

1.4 HDi

1.4 VTi 95

1.5 BlueHDi 102

1.6 BlueHDi 100

1.6 BlueHDi 120

1.6 BlueHDi 75

1.6 e-HDi 115

1.6 e-HDi 92 5MT

1.6 e-HDi 92 6MT

1.6 THP 155

1.6 THP 208

1.6 VTi 120

GTi 200

GTi 208

1.2 PureTech 110

1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d

1.2 PureTech 130 Euro6d

1.2 PureTech 130

1.2 PureTech 130 AT

1.2 VTi 82

1.5 BlueHDi 102 Euro6d

1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d

1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d AT

1.6 BlueHDi 100

1.6 BlueHDi 120

1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT

1.6 BlueHDi 99

1.6 e-HDI 115

1.6 HDI 92

1.6 PureTech 225 AT

1.6 THP 125

1.6 THP 156

2.0 BlueHDi 150

2.0 BlueHDi 150 AT

2.0 BlueHDi 177 AT

2.0 e-HDI 150

2.0 e-HDI 150 AT

GT 1.6 THP 205

GT 2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

GTi 263

GTi 250

GTi 270

1.4 VTi 95

1.4 VTi 98

1.6 e-HDi 112

1.6 e-HDi 115

1.6 HDi 109

1.6 HDi 90

1.6 HDi 92

1.6 THP 150

1.6 THP 150 AT

1.6 THP 156

1.6 THP 156 AT

1.6 THP 175

1.6 VTi 120

1.6 VTi 120 AT

2.0 HDi 136

2.0 HDi 136 AT

2.0 HDi 150

2.0 HDi 163 AT

GTi 200

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

60.0 L / 15.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Turning Circle

10.4 m / 34.1 ft

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

110 mm / 4.3 in

Size | Height

1498 mm / 59.0 in

Size | Length

4253 mm / 167.4 in

4276 mm / 168.3 in

Track Width | Front

1526.0 mm / 60.1 in

Track Width | Rear

1521.0 mm / 59.9 in

Wheelbase

2538 mm / 99.9 in

2608 mm / 102.7 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.28

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Redline

5000 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score

13%

21%

18%

Pros

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Low fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Low fuel consumption

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small, unreliable engines
No independent rear suspensions

Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Engine durability low

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.