HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 207 vs Peugeot 208 II vs BMW i3 I01

Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 75
e-208 50 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
22 kWh
22 kWh + Range Extender

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
4

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Elastic beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
9.9 m / 32.3 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross) | 46.0 kWh (net)
22.0 kWh (gross) | 18.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1430 mm / 56.3 in
1578 mm / 62.1 in
Size | Length
4055 mm / 159.6 in
3999 mm / 157.4 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
13 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
Electric Range
350.0 km / 217.5 mi
170.0 km / 105.6 mi
Fuel Economy
0.6 L/100km / 392.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
150.0 km/h / 93.2 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP

Production

Availability
2019
2013 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
16%
6%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Over low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • Horrible styling
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor build quality
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Miserable electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.