Compare Peugeot 207 vs Volkswagen NEW Beetle 9C facelift vs Volkswagen Polo 5 facelift

Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
1.4
1.6
1.8 Turbo
1.9 TDI
2.0
2.0 AT
1.0 60
1.0 75
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 110 DCT
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 DCT
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 110 DCT
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DCT
1.4 TDI 105
1.4 TDI 75
GTI
GTI DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
209 L / 7.4 cu-ft ~ 769 L / 27.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
4
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1498 mm / 59.0 in
Size | Length
4129 mm / 162.6 in
Size | Width
1721 mm / 67.8 in
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1507.0 mm / 59.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1487.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2515 mm / 99.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.38
Towing Capacity
600 kg / 1323 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1000 kg / 2205 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
22%
25%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • So ugly it's loved by many
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Rather smart, sporty design
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • High 0.38 drag coefficient
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.