HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Peugeot 207 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo vs Mazda 2 III

Variants
1.4 73
1.4 75
1.4 90
1.4 90 AT
1.4 HDi 68
1.4 HDi 70
1.4 VTi 95
1.4 VTi 95 Euro5
1.6 110
1.6 120
1.6 120 AT
1.6 HDi 110
1.6 HDi 112
1.6 HDi 90
1.6 HDi 92
1.6 THP 150
1.6 THP 156
1.6 VTi 120
1.6 VTi 120 AT
RC
RC Euro5
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
1.5 SkyActiv-D
1.5 SkyActiv-G 115
1.5 SkyActiv-G 75
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft ~ 923 L / 32.6 cu-ft
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
44.0 L / 11.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1472 mm / 58.0 in
1495 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4060 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1983 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheelbase
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.29
Towing Capacity
515 kg / 1135 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6

Reviews

Neofiliac score
8%
25%
26%
Pros
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Beautiful design
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Very tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Semi-independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.