HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare BMW i3 I01 vs Peugeot 208 II vs Peugeot 308 III

Variants
22 kWh
22 kWh + Range Extender
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 75
e-208 50 kWh
1.2 PureTech 100 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180 AT
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
260 L / 9.2 cu-ft ~ 1100 L / 38.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
9.0 L / 2.4 gal
Passengers
4
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Elastic beam
Torsion
Turning Circle
9.9 m / 32.3 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
22.0 kWh (gross) | 18.8 kWh (net)
50.0 kWh (gross) | 46.0 kWh (net)
12.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1578 mm / 62.1 in
1430 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
3999 mm / 157.4 in
4055 mm / 159.6 in
4367 mm / 171.9 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1859 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1571.0 mm / 61.9 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Wheelbase
2570 mm / 101.2 in
2540 mm / 100.0 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
13 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Electric Range
170.0 km / 105.6 mi
350.0 km / 217.5 mi
Fuel Economy
0.6 L/100km / 392.0 MPG (combined)
Top Speed
150.0 km/h / 93.2 mph
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Rear-engine (transverse), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 d-TEMP
Engine
EB2DTS
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2017
2019
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
6%
16%
26%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Over low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Improved styling
  • Small turning circle
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
Cons
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Miserable electric range
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling
  • Horrible styling
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor build quality
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.