Compare Mercedes A-Class W176 vs Mercedes B-Class W247 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser

Variants
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI DCT
A 180
A 180 BlueEFFICIENCY
A 180 DCT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI DCT
A 200
A 200 DCT
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI DCT
A 220 CDI DCT
A 250 4MATIC
A 250 DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 45 AMG
B 160
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180d
B 180d DCT
B 200
B 200 4MATIC DCT
B 200 DCT
B 200d DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 DCT
B 220d 4MATIC DCT
B 220d DCT
B 250 4MATIC DCT
B 250 DCT
B 250e DCT
1.6
2.0 141PS
2.0 141PS AT
2.0 150PS
2.0 150PS AT
2.2D 150PS
2.2D 121PS
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4T 182PS
2.4T 182PS AT
2.4T 220PS
2.4T 220PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
341 L / 12.0 cu-ft ~ 1157 L / 40.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
57.0 L / 15.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
17.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Trailing arm
Semi-independent
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1433 mm / 56.4 in
1562 mm / 61.5 in
Size | Length
4292 mm / 169.0 in
4419 mm / 174.0 in
Size | Width
1780 mm / 70.1 in
Track Width | Front
1553.0 mm / 61.1 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in

Performance

Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Transmission | Gears
6 / 7 / 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Manual / automatic / DCT

Production

Debut
2018 Paris Auto Show

Reviews

Neofiliac score
42%
27%
2%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Much improved styling
  • Much improved fit and finish
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Better-looking than before
  • So ugly that it's an icon
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • 4-cylinder AMG
  • No powerful engine options
  • Basic suspension setup for FWD vehicles
  • Utilitarian
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options
  • Not independent rear suspensions
  • Truly epitomizes ugliness

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.