Compare Honda HR-V 2 vs Chevrolet Traverse vs Chevrolet Captiva
Variants
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp AT
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp Euro6d
1.5 i-VTEC 130hp Euro6d CVT
1.5 i-VTEC Hybrid
1.5 VTEC Turbo
1.5 VTEC Turbo CVT
1.6 i-DTEC
1.6 i-DTEC Euro6d
1.8 i-VTEC
1.8 i-VTEC AWD CVT
1.8 i-VTEC CVT
281 AWD
281 FWD
288 AWD
288 FWD
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
83.3 L / 22.0 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 331 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/70 R17, 255/65 R18, 255/55 R20
Turning Circle
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
183 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Height
1605 mm / 63.2 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 20
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Towing Capacity
2358 kg / 5199 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6700 rpm
Engine | Stroke
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic 6T75
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
18%
21%
45%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- High cargo capacity
- Rather reliable powertrain
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very bland, unfinished styling
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.