Compare Nissan Qashqai 2 vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Nissan Qashqai 3
Variants
1.2
1.2 Euro6
1.2 CVT
1.2 Euro6 CVT
1.3 140
1.3 160
1.3 160 DCT
1.5 dCi 110 Euro6
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 DCT
1.6 dCi
1.6 dCi Euro6
1.6 dCi AWD
1.6 dCi Euro6 AWD
1.6 dCi CVT
1.6 dCi Euro6 CVT
1.6
1.7 dCi
1.7 dCi AWD
1.7 dCi AWD CVT
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.3 140
1.3 158
1.3 AWD CVT
1.3 CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.2 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door mild-hybrid Crossover
Platform
Nissan CMF-C platform
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
212 mm / 8.3 in
Size | Height
1649 mm / 64.9 in
1625 mm / 64.0 in
Size | Length
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4425 mm / 174.2 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheelbase
2646 mm / 104.2 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2665 mm / 104.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.33
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
EURO 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
81.3 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2021
Debut
2021-02-18
Made In
UK
Reviews
Neofiliac score
14%
27%
3%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Not very ugly
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Cheap to buy
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Unreliable engines and CVT
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very ugly
- Horrible build quality
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Only available with tiny engines
- Waste of raw materials
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.