Compare Nissan Qashqai 2 vs Honda CR-V 5 vs Honda Pilot 2

Nissan Qashqai 2 (J11) Crossover (2013-2020)

Nissan | Cars

Honda | Cars

Variants

1.2

1.2 Euro6

1.2 CVT

1.2 Euro6 CVT

1.3 140

1.3 160

1.3 160 DCT

1.5 dCi 110 Euro6

1.5 dCi 110

1.5 dCi 115

1.5 dCi 115 DCT

1.6 dCi

1.6 dCi Euro6

1.6 dCi AWD

1.6 dCi Euro6 AWD

1.6 dCi CVT

1.6 dCi Euro6 CVT

1.6

1.7 dCi

1.7 dCi AWD

1.7 dCi AWD CVT

1.5 173

1.5 173 AWD

1.5 190 AWD CVT

1.5 190 CVT

1.5 193 AWD CVT

1.6d 120 AT

1.6d 120 AWD AT

1.6d 160 AWD

1.6d 160 AWD AT

2.0 AWD CVT

2.0 CVT

2.0 Hybrid

2.0 Hybrid AWD

2.0 Hybrid Euro6d

2.0 Hybrid Euro6d AWD

2.4 AWD CVT

2.4 CVT

AWD

FWD

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

79.0 L / 20.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs, 330 mm

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Disc, 333 mm

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.7 m / 35.2 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Crossover

5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

203 mm / 8.0 in

Size | Width

1994 mm / 78.5 in

Track Width | Rear

1560.0 mm / 61.4 in

1715.0 mm / 67.5 in

Wheelbase

2646 mm / 104.2 in

2774 mm / 109.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.33

Powertrain

Emission Standard

ULEV-2

Engine

J35Z4

Engine | Bore

89.0 mm / 3.5 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

Engine | Displacement

3.5 L / 211.8 cu-in / 3471.0 cc

Engine | Power

253.0 hp / 188.7 kW @ 5700 rpm

Engine | Redline

6300 rpm

Engine | Specific Output

72.9 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in

Engine | Stroke

93.0 mm / 3.7 in

Engine | Torque

343 Nm / 253.0 lb-ft @ 4800 rpm

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Gears

5-speed

Transmission | Type

Automatic

Production

Availability

2008 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score

14%

41%

34%

Pros

Low official fuel consumption
Not very ugly

High cargo capacity
Good towing capacity
Good engine reliability

Some offroad capabilities
High cargo capacity
High engine reliability

Cons

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Unreliable engines and CVT
No independent rear suspensions

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Horrible CVT

Quite ugly
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.