Compare Volvo XC60 II vs Peugeot 3008 II facelift vs Peugeot 5008 II facelift

Variants
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.2 PureTech 131
1.2 PureTech 131 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 131
1.5 BlueHDi 131 AT
Hybrid
Hybrid4
1.6 PureTech 181 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
702 L / 24.8 cu-ft ~ 2150 L / 75.9 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
7

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
20.0 deg
19.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
29.0 deg
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Water Fording
700 mm / 27.6 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
18.8 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
216 mm / 8.5 in
219 mm / 8.6 in
236 mm / 9.3 in
Size | Height
1658 mm / 65.3 in
1624 mm / 63.9 in
1646 mm / 64.8 in
Size | Length
4447 mm / 175.1 in
4641 mm / 182.7 in
Size | Width
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
1844 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
1601.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
18.6 km / 11.6 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
90.5 mm / 3.6 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic

Production

Availability
2017
2020
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
57%
21%
24%
Pros
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Low consumption
  • Decent styling
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Poor suspension setup
  • PHEV nonsense
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Ugly
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.