Compare Volvo XC60 II vs BMW X5 F15 vs BMW X5 E53

Variants
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
sDrive25d
xDrive25d
sDrive25d
xDrive25d
xDrive30d
xDrive35i
xDrive40d
xDrive40e
xDrive50i
M50d
3.0d
3.0d AT
3.0i
3.0i AT
4.4i AT
4.6is AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
465 L / 16.4 cu-ft ~ 1550 L / 54.7 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 332 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc, 324 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
25.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.0 deg
20.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
12.7 m / 41.7 ft
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Water Fording
500 mm / 19.7 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
18.8 kWh (gross)
9.2 kWh (gross) | 6.8 kWh (net)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
351.0 V
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
216 mm / 8.5 in
209 mm / 8.2 in
Size | Height
1658 mm / 65.3 in
1762 mm / 69.4 in
1717 mm / 67.6 in
Size | Length
4886 mm / 192.4 in
4666 mm / 183.7 in
Size | Width
1872 mm / 73.7 in
Track Width | Front
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1576.0 mm / 62.0 in
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2933 mm / 115.5 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
18.6 km / 11.6 mi
31.0 km / 19.3 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2700 kg / 5952 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
8-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic
Automatic Steptronic

Production

Availability
2017
2000 ~ 2003

Reviews

Neofiliac score
57%
60%
40%
Pros
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Decent engine reliability
  • Some utility offered
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Disastrous engine reliability
  • Quite ugly on the outside
  • Unreliable transmission

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.