Compare Volvo XC60 II (SPA) vs Audi Q3 Sportback (F3) vs Toyota C-HR facelift

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)

Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)

Toyota C-HR facelift

Volvo XC60 II (SPA)Audi Q3 Sportback (F3)Toyota C-HR facelift
Variants
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
35 TDI DCT
35 TDI quattro
35 TDI quattro DCT
35 TFSI
35 TFSI DCT
40 TDI 190 quattro DCT
40 TDI 200 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 230 quattro DCT
45 TFSI 245 quattro DCT
45 TFSI e DCT
1.2
1.2 AWD CVT
1.2 CVT
1.8 Hybrid
2.0 CVT
2.0 Hybrid

Reviews

Neofiliac score57%32%42%
Pros
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good marketing
  • Good engine reliability
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Impractical and ugly
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor performance
  • Only available with small engines
  • Impractical

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.